Sunday, September 28, 2008

No. No other answer. NO.

Any Congressman who does not vote "NO" under these conditions should be tried for treason.

Here's what is happening, as reported on LiveLeak.

HOUSE LEADERSHIP INVOKES “MARTIAL LAW,” FORCING MEMBERS TO VOTE ON KEY BILLS WITHOUT FULL KNOWLEDGE OF WHAT THEY ARE VOTING ON:

Under the martial law procedure, longstanding House rules that require at least one day between the unveiling of significant legislation and the House floor vote on that legislation — so that Members can learn what they are being asked to vote on — are swept away. Instead, under “martial law,” the Leadership can file legislation with tens or hundreds of pages of fine print and move immediately to debate and votes on it, before Members of Congress, the media, or the public have an opportunity to understand fully what provisions have been altered or inserted into the legislation behind closed doors. This is the procedure that the Leadership intends to use to muscle through important bills in the next two days.


Good God in Heaven.

How many people even know that "Martial Law" is unconstitutional?
But we need it - to protect us from terrorists!

Just like we need the bailout now. To protect us from, um, somthing.

No comments: